30 Days to Emotional Awareness & Wellness Challenge
Dr. Shené Marsh-Beckford • October 23, 2018
Day 22: Back to School
Another important component of culture, as it relates to emotional awareness and wellness, is education. Any learning or training initiative designed for competency development functions as a form of education. In most educational environments, culture operates as a powerful force that influences the emotional experience of learners.
Schools are one of the primary and most influential outlets for educating both youth and adults. Cultural factors in these settings often influence what is taught and how learning is delivered. Rivera (2012) mentioned that, in the U.S. both “government-mandated and socially influenced curriculums” are used to shape our learning experience (para. 1).
Unfortunately, initiatives focused on social and emotional learning (SEL) are not always included in current educational curricula. Even though recent research (e.g. Brackett & Rivers, 2014; Nathanson, Rivers, Flynn, & Brackett, 2016) shows competence in social and emotional intelligence (SEI) skills has positive effects on academic achievement, many institutions (in both Pre-K through 12 and higher education) have not incorporated explicit strategies for skill development into their programs. Modifying educational curricula across the board would be ideal for cultivating emotionally intelligent populations.
Often learners completing their education in programs that lack tenets for SEI skill development end up being at a disadvantage because they don’t gain the ‘people skills’ (aka ‘soft’ skills) necessary for successful leadership and performance. Failing to incorporate essential SEI skills into learning programs also contributes to a shortage of skills essential in the workplace. Earlier this year in a CNBC interview, LinkedIn CEO, Jeff Weiner reported study findings implicating a ‘soft’ skills gap and an increase in skills deficiencies around interpersonal competence and communication; demonstrating some of the long-term implications. Click the link below (see References) to watch the video and see what Jeff had to say.
Educational leaders, facilitators, and professionals need not take these research insights lightly. To create change in this area, we need start with the decision-makers, faculty, and staff of learning communities by helping them craft and/or refine expertise in SEI and SEL and learn to effectively apply their skills in the teaching space and in various types of learning programs. Starting here would likely help trigger a nation-wide movement that could lead to one of the biggest socially-driven educational change movements our culture has ever seen.Is this a possibility or just a fantasy? What are your thoughts?
References
CNBC. (2018, April 18). LinkedIn CEO on the ‘soft’ skills gap [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.cnbc.com/video/2018/04/19/linkedin-ceo-on-the-soft-skills-gap.html
Rivera, N. (2012, April 5). Opportunity and limitation: The culture of education. Retrieved from https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/psyched/201204/opportunity-and-limitation-the-culture-education
I recently collaborated on another article for LinkedIn that explored strategies for managing emotions in high-pressure situations, specifically focusing on handling unrealistic client expectations. LinkedIn shared the following insights to start the conversation: "Maintaining objectivity is key to keeping your emotions in check. When faced with unrealistic expectations, it's easy to become personally invested or feel under attack. Instead, focus on the facts and detach your personal feelings from the situation. Approach the conversation with a problem-solving mindset, considering the client's perspective while also being clear about what is feasible. This balanced view will help you navigate the conversation with a level head." After giving it some thought, I added the following in response to their inquiry: Unrealistic expectations can arise in any business interaction. To manage them effectively, start by detaching yourself from personal frustration and focusing on the concrete details and feasibility of the client’s demands. Address the situation with a clear, fact-based approach rather than letting emotions dictate your response. This method helps guide the discussion toward practical solutions, preserves your professionalism, and ensures a constructive exchange. By staying grounded in facts and maintaining transparency, you reinforce your role as a rational problem-solver by fostering a more effective and productive dialogue. Embracing this approach also allows you to turn challenges into opportunities for growth and resolution. To further explore this LinkedIn collaborative article, click here .
Emotional intelligence (EI) is a factor affecting various personal and professional life aspects. It is defined as the capability to perceive, understand, manage, and apply feelings effectively. It is an indispensable requisite for emotional well-being and psychological safety, as well as overall effective performance in the workplace. This blog post explains how EI influences those aspects by emphasizing its importance in maintaining a productive and friendly work atmosphere. Emotional Well-Being Emotional well-being is an important component of mental health in general; EI makes great contribution to its improvement. A person with high EI knows how to perceive and control his or her emotions, which helps to handle stress and develop resilience. Key elements of how EI contributes to emotional well-being will involve : Stress Management: High EI persons can recognize and manage their feelings when they are stressed. They are, therefore, able to keep calm and composed, reducing the effects of stress on their mental life. Positive Attitude: T Individuals who have high EI happen to be positive in outlook. They also reframe negative experiences, focus on the positive aspects, and develop a more optimistic mindset, which consequently enhances their general emotional well-being. Resilience: EI helps them in developing resilience against emotional challenges. Since they manage their emotions well, they bounce back from setbacks faster and maintain good mental health well into the future. Mental Health: The ability to manage emotions fosters a reduction in anxiety, depression, and burnout. Individuals with high EI thus become resilient to emotional challenges, which is a guarantee of good mental health and well-being. Psychological Safety The concept of psychological safety at work is defined as "a feeling that one will not be punished or penalized for expressing one's self". High EI significantly enhances psychological safety in the workplace since it aids in empathy, effective communication, and resolving interpersonal conflicts. Key points to remember: Empathy: High EI people can understand and share the feelings of others. The empathy in them allows one to give immense support and inclusion to the employees at work by making them feel appreciated and recognized. Effective Communication: EI amplifies communication art, hence the individual can express and listen to others. In that respect, effective communication reduces misunderstandings and builds trust in teamwork. Conflict Resolution: Individuals high on EI are capable of resolving conflicts. They can handle the emotional dynamics, mediate disputes, and find mutually constructive solutions that help create a harmonious work environment. Inclusive Culture: Leaders and employees with high EI will be able to recognize and engage with emotional cues to create an inclusive culture where everyone can safely share their thoughts and ideas without being persecuted. Workplace Performance EI is considered one of the major predictors of workplace performance. Individuals with high EI understand how to handle their emotions and take care of the emotions of others, which improves teamwork, and collaboration, and hence enhances their performance at work. The essential elements of how EI can impact performance at workplaces include but are not limited to the following aspects: Teamwork: High-EI individuals could work in a team by empathizing with team players and influencing team dynamics based on the same. The art of doing this strengthens teamwork and allows groups to maintain more cohesive and productive atmospheres. Collaboration: EI leads to collaboration. People with high EI know how to treat interpersonal relationships, establish functional relationships, and work in various kinds of teams. Productivity: The efficient treatment of emotions significantly promotes better concentration and focus on work. High EI employees are less likely to be distracted by emotional disturbances, which raises their productivity level. Interpersonal Dynamics: High emotional intelligence helps an individual understand and manage the dynamics of interpersonal relationships. This minimizes the probability of disputes and misunderstandings. This ability develops better general organizational performance by creating an optimistic and collaborative atmosphere to work in. Emotional Intelligence is part of emotional well-being, psychological safety, and work performance. High EI individuals possess an excellent level of handling stress, keeping a positive outlook on life, and building resilience; therefore, they function well for their mental health and fitness. In the workplace, EI nurtures empathy, effective communication, and conflict resolution-that is, a psychologically safe environment where employees can prosper. Additionally, due to improved teamwork, collaboration, and productivity, EI greatly enhances performance at work. As organizations continue to recognize the value of EI, investing in its development will result in more engaged, resilient, and high-performing employees and teams.
EI has received considerable attention within the disciplines of psychology, organizational behavior, and leadership studies. Despite its reportedly popular influence on both personal and professional success, the theoretical landscape of EI remains diverse and keeps on evolving. The present article overviews the current theoretical diversity in the EI paradigm and emphasizes effective strategies for assessing and developing EI in various contexts. In this article, we revisit the theoretical variety in the EI paradigm by re-examining the distinct contributions and implications of each of the major models. We go on to detail good practices for the assessment and development of EI, reflecting current research and practical examples. The article aims to arrive at an advanced view of EI and its applications which will helpably shed light on and guide the efforts of researchers, educators, and practitioners toward furthering emotional intelligence in diverse settings. Theoretical Diversity in Emotional Intelligence Mayer and Salovey's Ability Model Views EI as a facet of cognitive intelligence involved in the processing of emotional information. Four-branch model: Perceiving emotions, using emotions to facilitate thought, understanding emotions, and managing emotions. Intends to make an objective measurement of EI through tasks and problem-solving activities. Goleman's Mixed Model Combines emotional and social competencies. Five components: Self-awareness, self-regulation, motivation, empathy, and social skills. Has a greater focus on the practical utility of EI in leadership and organizational settings. Bar-On's Trait Model Conceptualizes EI as a set of emotional and social competencies that determine a person's well-being and harmony with other people. Includes personality traits; a strong emphasis is placed on the role of EI in maintaining good mental health. Relies on self-report questionnaires for the evaluation of EI. Petrides' Trait EI Model R efers to a constellation of emotional self-perceptions located at the lower levels of personality hierarchies. The subjective nature of emotional experiences makes many of them difficult to operationalize or quantify. Self-report measures tap into people's perceptions of their emotional abilities. Each of these theoretical frameworks has its meaning to both the researcher and the practitioner. Each model contributes something different to the conceptualization, measurement, and development of how EI can be understood and reflects the complexity and multifaceted nature of emotional intelligence. Whereas, for instance, the ability model by Mayer and Salovey focuses on the cognitive aspects of EI, the mixed model by Goleman brings together emotional competencies with social skills for a holistic view. By contrast, models by Bar-On and by Petrides put the emphasis on the subjective and personality-related dimensions in EI and provide other ways of assessment and development. Achieving Impactful Outcomes Given the importance of EI in various domains, best practices should be instituted for assessing and developing EI. Truly effective assessment strategies will be able to capture the multi-dimensional nature of EI through the use of self-report measures in conjunction with performance-based tests and feedback from others. Conversely, developmental programs should be tailored to needs at the individual and group levels through the use of personal coaching, training sessions, and organization-level interventions. Best Practices for Assessing Emotional Intelligence Multi-Method Approaches Combine self-report measures with performance-based tests and 360-degree feedback. Ensures a comprehensive assessment of the different facets of EI. Context-Specific Assessments Ensure that assessments are performed in specific contexts and for specific goals of organizations or individuals. Recognize that the expression of EI changes with environment and role. Continuous and Developmental Assessment Emphasizes ongoing assessment over one-shot assessments. Integrates regular feedback and plans for development on EI. Best Practices for Developing Emotional Intelligence Individual Development Programs Individual coaching and training in selected EI competencies. Mindfulness practices, emotional regulation exercises, reflective practices. Group and Team Development Workshops and training programs with groups/teams to enhance collective EI. Activities that encourage team bonding, empathy, and good communication. Integration into Organizational Culture Embed the development of EI into the DNA of the core values and practices of the organization. Incentivize the leadership to model high EI behaviors and support emotionally intelligent workplaces. Only by implementing best practices with regard to assessment and development will the full potential underlying the individuals and groups come forth. Using multi-method approaches, assessments fitted to specific contexts, placing a continuous emphasis on development, and integrating EI into the culture of organizations are ways in which practitioners can effectively and sustainably implement their EI initiatives. These efforts will go toward not only the personal and professional success of an individual but also the building of empathetic, resilient, high-performing organizations and communities. Inasmuch as the theoretical underpinning and practical applications are pursued, the field of EI will continue to grow, affording valuable insights and means through which emotional intelligence can be fostered.